The serious health claims of the
developmental problems in newborn children cannot be easily
explained by just the "EMF-connection". There are very,
very, very many environmental pollutants. Singling out EMF
without solid evidence and supporting the claims using small
studies with few cases is not good way to stimulate science
and regulatory authorities to action.
Besides the ongoing
"environmental assault", human kind is slowly "genetically
deteriorating" because the laws of natural selection do not
work anymore. Thanks to progress in medicine, many persons,
who in older days would pass away, live and pass on their
genes and coded in them ailments.
Making EMFs guilty of every
possible disease or ailment that causes are unknown is too
far fetched to accept.
The applicability of the 2011
IARC classification of the cell phone radiation as a
possible carcinogen to the "smart meters" was one point of
the debate.
The "smart meters" as such were
not debated in Lyon in 2011 and, consequently, the "smart
meters" are not mentioned in the summary overview that was
published last year in the Lancet Oncology.
Of course the IARC decision
classifying cell phone radiation as a possible carcinogen
can be extended to cover all sources of cell-phone-like
radiation, including cell towers, wlan and "smart meters".
However, there is not equality between the sources of
radiofrequency radiation and there will not be equality in
their potential effects on the living organisms.
Sources like cell towers, wlan
and "smart meters" emit thousands of times less energy than
cell phones and therefore it is logical to expect that the
effects, if any, caused by their radiation will be far
lesser than the effects caused by cell phone exposures.
Treating different sources of EMF
as potentially equally important sources of health hazard
and justifying such with the IARC classification is a clear
abuse of the IARC decision. All concerned with the possible
health risks should carefully consider not only the quality
of radiation but even more importantly the quantity. Too
little of radiation will be unable to trigger any effects
even if the quality would be suitable to do so.
The jury is still out and more
studies are necessary to determine whether cell phone
radiation causes brain cancer and whether EMF are solely
responsible for the symptoms experienced by the
self-diagnosed EHS people.
Try any
Q-Link or
cell chip
for 3 months, absolutely
RISK-FREE If you do not feel Q-Link improves your
focus, energy, or well-being, simply return it for a full
refund.
Airtube headsets have
30 a day refund.
