While most people want wireless communications, the siting
of transmitters needs to be based on minimizing harm. If
there will be children or homes close to the antennas these
people are more susceptible to harm from RFR exposure as
chronic long-term exposure leads to cumulative damage and
the development of electrohypersensitivty and children’s
smaller bodies absorb more radiation.* In addition,
wildlife, with bees in particular, may have their
navigational abilities interfered with due to RFR exposure.
*Lai and Singh confirmed in 1997 that EMF exposure has
cumulative effects.
The report, Merger of Two Different Dosimetry Rationales -
August 2009, out of Russia, compares the two approaches to
establishing exposure guidelines. It says:
http://piers.mit.edu/piersproceedings/download.php?
file=cGllcnMyMDA5bW9zY293fDJQNmJfMDE1Ny5wZGZ8MDkwMjE5MTYxMzQx
(Access the html version here - http://tiny.cc/2CIgv )
“…One approach is based on the measure or estimate of
specific absorption rate [SAR used in the U.S.], which is
the power absorbed per unit weight of an object. The other
relies on the measure of the time integrated radiofrequency
power density incident on an object. [Cumulative biological
effects used in Russia.]…
…the Russian Federation exposure limits are founded on
chronic biological effects caused by non thermal EMF
exposures; the effects were investigated using behavioral,
electrophysiological, hematological and biochemical
methods...
Wollongong, Australia
Benin, Porto-Novo
Cote d'Ivoire Yamoussoukro
Fontana California USA
Jordan, Amman
Costa Mesa, California
Guinea, Conakry
Baltimore, Maryland
Nedlands Victoria Australia
Al Ghabah, United Arab Emirates, Al Ghabah, UAE
Try any
Q-Link or
cell chip
for 3 months, absolutely
RISK-FREE If you do not feel Q-Link improves your
focus, energy, or well-being, simply return it for a full
refund.
Airtube headsets have
30 a day refund.
