EMF Protection Cellphone Radiation Mobile Phone SAR Electromagnetic Prevention EMF Qlink Protect EMF Cell Phone Radiation

cell phone radiation research, hyperelectrosensitivity from cell phone radiation

   
 

FEATURED PRODUCT

Facts About the EarthCalm® Home Protection System:

home radiation protection

Retail $398.00
Sale Price $298.00

Read the Earthcalm® FAQ to learn more

 

 

Specialty Air Tube Headset

 

$36.99

airtube headset, bluetube headset, anit-radiation headset for driving

RF3-212S

Airtube Headset info

 
 

 

 

   Cell Phone Radiation Is Dangerous – You Need To listen To The Right Scientists Part 1

 

Cell Phone Radiation, Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Life Bluetube Headset

Cell Phone Radiation Protection

Mobile Phone Radiation Protection

Trifield Electromagnetic Field Meter

Today I would like to share with you a UK documentary on the electromagnetic pollution debate. It’s a great little film. I enjoyed watching it as much today as when it came out a few years ago.

In this film you will learn:
- how an electrosensitive person from Stockholm, Sylvia, lives her daily life under the protection of various shielding materials and anti radiation paint
- how the Swedish government have a very different approach to the use of WiFi in schools, to that of the UK and the US. Even if only one person is affected in a classroom the WiFi is immediately removed.
- how the UK government spurned the advice of Sir William Stuart the chairman of their own advisory group. He clearly states that there are adverse health effects from using cell phones
- that governments around the world are basing their safety levels on the advice of the world health organization. But the chief scientist at the WHO, Dr. Michael Repacholi, was formerly on the payroll of the cellphone industry!

Let there be no doubt the current safety standards offer little protection from the wireless onslaught. You need to take your own steps to protect you and your family from EMFs. Heres the video.

Interviewer: Three percent of the population suffer from this disability. Translate that to the UK, and it’s about 2 million people. Yes, as far as our government’s concerned, there are none.
We set off for Stockholm and Swedish Sylvia’s city center flat. She’s plotted a route to avoid all the masts. She wants to show us just how seriously her government takes her condition. Like the UK, this is a place where more and more people are acquiring WiFi, but there’s a key difference.
Woman: Okay, Sylvia, this is my living room, and today the painter has been here. And you see he has started painting black.
Interviewer: And this is anti-radiation paint?

Woman: Yes. It’s very expensive.
Interviewer: Anti-radiation paint – paid for by the local authority. It shields her from neighbors’ WiFi and from nearby phone masts.
So, the Swedes have the same scientific evidence, but they recognize sufferers. In Swedish schools, even if there’s only one person apparently affected by WiFi, the system’s removed and the classroom shielded.
You’d think our government would base its decisions on the advice of their top man, the one who’s employed to protect our health, Sir William Stuart. But instead, it seems to have turned to others. First, the World Health Organization – it’s robust in its language, saying there are no adverse health effects from low-level, long-term exposure.
Is that an accurate reflection of the science, do you think?

Sir Wm. Stuart: I think they’re wrong.
Interviewer: How are they wrong?
Stuart: Because there’s evidence.
Interviewer: So, why do you think the WHO, one of the most influential public health bodies in the world continues to put out that message?
Stuart: I think they’ve got to review the statement that they’re making. I think it’s not an accurate reflection.

Interviewer: Then, there’s this – it’s unlikely that you’ll have heard of ICNIRP, but it’s an international group of scientists which our government relies on to set our radiation limits. But, here’s the problem – it doesn’t recognize any biologic effects, so it bases our exposure limits on a thermal effect. In other words, the radiation has to be so strong that it heats our organs before it’s restricted. That’s why our safety limits are so high.
How responsible do you think it is for governments to set limits for this form of radiation according only to a thermal effect?

Professor Henry Lai: Well, I think it’s irresponsible to just set standards using a thermal standard. If you just set it based on a thermal effect, you’re ignoring a large amount of danger.

Interviewer: Most countries, including the UK, set their radiation limits according to the ICNIRP guidelines. They can’t be wrong, can they?
Professor Olle Johanssen: Well, hopefully not, because as you say, governments, and in that way whole countries, the entire populations rely upon them. And I do hope they deliver the right and correct message. However, I know also that they are heavily industry funded. Their basic message is that if you’re below a certain thermal level, then it’s all right.

Interviewer: Are they right to set their guidelines only according to thermal effect?
Johanssen: No, no, no. That’s just rubbish. You cannot put any emphasis on such guidelines.

Cell Phone Radiation Is Dangerous - You Need To listen To The Right Scientists Part 2

Namibia, Windhoek
Erie, Pennsylvania
Logan City, Queensland
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Davenport, Iowa
Slovakia, Bratislava
Oceanside, California
Cockburn, Victoria
Antigua and Barbuda, St. John's
Dhadna, United Arab Emirates, Dhadna, UAE

http://www.emfnews.org/storeee


"Revolutionary New Technologiess
Protect You from the Harmful Effects of Cell Phone Radiation,

Computers, Bluetooth Headsets, Microwave Ovens,

Cordless Phones, and other Wireless Technologies."

 

Click on any of the pictures below to learn more

 
 
 
Contact:
Research Center For Wireless Technology

1-888-470-9886

support@emfnews.org

Copyright ©2006-2015 All rights reserved

| Privacy | Disclaimer | Returns

 
Try any Q-Link or cell chip for 3 months, absolutely  RISK-FREE If you do not feel Q-Link improves your focus, energy, or well-being, simply return it for a full refund. Airtube headsets have 30  a day refund.

Contact:
Research Center For Wireless Technology

1-888-470-9886

201-484-7652
Copyright ©2006-2015 All rights reserved
| Privacy | Disclaimer |
 
 


Other Language Tools