More complex measures would be to have system compatibility
and planned infrastructure roll out. With our Business As
Usual attitude this may no longer be possible. Instead of
creating the false siting restrictions based on appearance,
we should have based it on health. Antennas should be sited
where they will do the least harm and anyone who is in a EMF/RFR
hot spot should be compensated in some way. Shielding or
relocating would both help. The best way to avoid intended
and unintended RFR is to install fiber optics as the system
has no RFR emissions. Instead of adopting these measures,
the injured are left to their own devices. Industry has done
its best to label the people they have harmed as being
crazy.
In addition to the above measures, Dr. George Carlo,
chairman of the Wireless Technology Research program (WTR)
from 1993 – 1999, a $28.5 million research program, funded
by the cellular phone industry that investigated the
possible health effects of cellular phones wrote in a recent
article in the American Trial Lawyer that:
Laws should be enacted to place health warnings on cell
phones and wireless devices, as well as warning signs in
public spaces that carry WiFi and other wireless signals.
The Telecommunications Act must be amended to include
victims' compensation provisions; incentives for the
development and commercialization of technologies to
[protect] users from harmful electromagnetic radiation; and
civil rights provisions to promote environmental and health
risk protection for homeowners in communities where cell
phone base stations and other wireless infrastructure are
constructed.
It is imperative that the U.S. government reexamines our RFR
exposure level and adjusts it to protect populations from
having their health adversely impacted by RFR exposure. The
Telecommunication’s Act of 1996 needs to be revised to allow
local oversight and health concerns as part of the criteria
for antenna siting. The Coalition for Local Oversight of
Utility Technologies is working on this effort here in the
U.S. I urge you to get involved and advocate for lower RFR
exposure standards. Please go to www.cloutnow.org to find
out how you can get involved in this important work.
Liechtenstein, Vaduz
Elgin, Illinois
Lebanon, Beirut
City of Lake Macquarie, Australia
Cory R. New Jersey
Guatemala, Guatemala City
Swaziland, Mbabane
Turkey, Ankara
Westminster, Colorado
Al Mataf, United Arab Emirates, Al Mataf, UAE
Try any
Q-Link or
cell chip
for 3 months, absolutely
RISK-FREE If you do not feel Q-Link improves your
focus, energy, or well-being, simply return it for a full
refund.
Airtube headsets have
30 a day refund.
